ARECES JOSE MANUEL DE AVILA .-
liberal newspaper editor It has long been amply demonstrated that the autonomous status is untenable in absolute terms. The voices more weight in our economy and business, namely the sovereign civil society, have come more than clear in this regard.
Two recent studies continue to demand a serious change of course in this sense, a part of the report of the Foundation and other Everis the FAES. Both documents are compelling in its analysis and matching both the diagnosis and recommendations. In short, we can not afford such waste, is an absurdity in the social and a strainer on the van the best resources of the Nation, and in this case, Mr Zapatero, the nation, with capital letters, nor is it a concept discussed or arguably, even seeking to apply moral relativism. Facts are stubborn, as Lincoln said, and no fact more evidence that the existence and presence in world history of the English nation, one and indivisible.
Most of our politicians sidestep the debate on whether to curb the so-called state of autonomies, the explanation is very simple, it is about power and employment. We never had so many politicians on the payroll, and this we thank them precisely to the 17 autonomous communities and cities that give manger to 17 parliaments, many ministries, departments, advisory positions and follow you counting, all without speaking of bars, businesses public, foundations, associations, councils and other chairs. In short, nobody cares bell the cat, take the scissors and get their hands on the mess, mostly because many friends and supporters should get a job. Quite the contrary arguments and benefits are sought to justify the unjustifiable confidence in the paper and the English people support it all.
Perhaps the argument itself vacuo and demagogic that we find is that of freedom and democracy. Apparently according to some scholars of professional party politics, the state of autonomy provides us with higher doses of liberty, and makes democracy more representative. The speech is there. Consider the question: It seems that the old division of municipal, provincial and central state, the English did not allow us to be more free and it seems also that this was very democratic. Democracy, in essence, is the free choice by the nation of its representatives to the governance of public affairs, or whatever it is all there is is the thing. Another issue is the administrative division, we want to give our state, which is a technical issue that has nothing to do with democracy itself. Perhaps, if we wish to delve into the concepts of freedom and democracy, we should not focus our order to create heavy structures where thousands and thousands of professional politicians, relatives, cronies, lackeys, mourners, abrazafarolas, conmilitones, clappers and other similar seating staying a hole where his buttocks. Perhaps the fact of democratic parties, promoting equal opportunities, allowing open lists would help the militants, who in my humble opinion are the owners of the parties, not their bodies, encourages the perfection of democracy . A good politician is not to be afraid of any kind to run in a fair fight against other peers to be a candidate in his conmilitones, see the example of the United States. Moreover, Allowing the reform of the electoral law to favor the direct election of candidates for constituencies personal and not party too much favor freedom of choice to the voter and ensure representation in the defense of the interests of the territory. All these measures so simple, they are much more effective to keep the monolithic anti-democratic party discipline, and avoided the so costly territorial divisions and interests villagers, not only stain the political game, but ruined our economy.
There is a premise as demonstrable as the laws of Murphy, is that if you put a politician in a given position, it tends to surround himself immediately secretarial, administrative, personal trust and other laborers to do work for him, given that full attendance, meetings, inaugurations, parades, Christmas drinks, lunches, dinners and other evening parties that accompany the charge, do not leave much time for administration. Another evident premise tells us that when a politician decides to make a determined political action behind this is to make regulations, laws, provide ad hoc budgets, hire staff and create the appropriate bodies for which the policy is carried out. Based on these two fundamental premises conclude that the administration of the public in Spain is something endless, which reproduces itself regardless of available funding, and it is always directly proportional to the number of active politicians. Therefore conclude that any of the ways we should have 17 autonomous when it became apparent what is behind it. From the point of view, a rational and effective management must be cost effective, low cost and they have never overstaffed. The problem is that in politics there are very few entrepreneurs and many officials, and these powders are these quagmires, the diagnosis is very simple.
We need, as the economist said Manuel Muela, a plan B, a plan that predicts a better future for Spain we provide a viable and successful institutional problem, economic and moral raging in the nation. The problem is that since there is no first or Unamuno, Ortega or even having a voice and moral weight in front of our party politics whose deaf ears, far to the real needs of society and the interests of the nation, remain adamantly to defend positions and perks in maintaining a sterile debate, and propose recipes persistently overlook the underlying problem. The inevitable conclusion of blood on this earth and sun, Cains, fights and riots and revolutions, is that when a problem is left on the shelf, waiting to go away by itself, ends when ball growing Snow and creating a dangerous domino effect that can only portend chaos, poverty and desolation everywhere.
insist therefore that it is time to make decisions, to agree, to be brave and put the sights on the common good against the short-term benefit of the party. Hour is to forge some agreements state that endorse the future it deserves a Western nation, democratic and advanced society, with our historical weight, and predict that the brave people who will step forward electoral gains will get the best you'll ever have expected that yes, the matter requires effort, perseverance, imagination, nobility, some of idealism, realism and a lot of love for the motherland. This not the job of a party, but a collective effort.
0 comments:
Post a Comment