ARECES JOSÉ MANUEL DE AVILA .- Liberal Newspaper Editor, The reformist
Phrygia Epictetus said, around the year 100 AD, that truth alone triumphs and yet the lying states of complicity.
In this society we live in semi-freedom is absent in a rush to our borders, precisely because of the complicity. This is a society dominated by what are called public, when in reality is private, because they live in government public affairs, ie, for all but a few who govern us, who make their careers and post something private property almost. So to keep the establishment or the farm in the hands of the chief is needed by the complicity of the long-standing common methodology of political patronage.
The domain of all economic and institutional spring provides the power to manage the favors in small doses, and thus make borreguiles minds of ordinary people, the idea of \u200b\u200baspiring to acquire the distribution of which is owned by a few managers of the commons, so that common fact is assimilated to the mind of the citizen to live in a country where to buy a home, under certain favorable conditions, involving the state, which governs whether a private company or not, allowing smoking to their customers where you think about having or not a child depending on the existence of subsidies, or if you have it, is the state dictating how you must educate . This is the society in which we live, and we are complicit in its existence, accomplices because we recognize a lie, because in this society we call democracy.
This is a society where a few rule matches, constitutionally are the only instruments allowed to manage common resources, civil society is completely out, so to think, to act, except that it folds through their associations, to receive in their bodies of political power to servers or corresponding financial support to sustain itself. When any individual person in the exercise of its responsibilities, or at their principles, deviates from the current public official disagrees with the power, faces ostracism, civil death and discredit.
participate in the big lie of all citizens, media, social networks, companies, associations civilians and even serene. Recently, filmmaker Alex de la Iglesia, then President of a body that has traditionally been an extension of the PSOE, and the izquierdona recalcitrant had the bad taste of disaffected regime, the official truth and the desire of his mistress, ie, the Culture Minister, opposing the law regulating Internet regarding downloads and copyright. May or may not be in favor of the principles of the Basque director, which I have very clear is that support for the system, anyone who will stand up to power in defense of principles, because it is an exercise of freedom and nobility almost obsolete.
One of the branches where more tradition, saturates the left cave and cacique, is the scene called for the puppeteers, for its clear visibility and influence promotion and advertising, which has served so well over the decades to the PSOE. The innumerable clunkers infumables grants, sectarian guerracivilistas documentaries and films that reflect the most cumbersome and minority in our society, have provided a tool of indoctrination and social engineering unpayable, that would have delighted Goebbels. Can not therefore admit that one of the propaganda organs of the party there is a single verse, much less the presidency, is an unacceptable fact, anathema!. De la Iglesia
committed
a cardinal sin, when not opting for Sinde law, but were afraid to go too far, when to ride roughshod instructions of the Minister, met with representatives of Internet users to understand their arguments and zoom positions, ie, to seek consensus, passing it by a triumphal arch to the state, which in this system, which dictates who you are, and must be considered as social actors.
therefore praise the courage of Alex de la Iglesia, direct opposition to subtopia and personal coherence. This has earned a fan for the value shown, as we all know that the penalty for acting with freedom in this system, it is always out the door girl and ostracism. The individual feats always deserve a little applause, and when they happen deserve the favor of the audience. Each individual act of courage is a gap, however small, in the system, an act of honor, and a call to hope, a gap that opens to accommodate in the near future, an exiled freedom, which waiting patiently for a majority of citizens, claiming his return to this country numbed by the selfishness of a ruling caste, and the complicity of a mass of beggars, devoid of all honor and dignity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment