Outlet Canada Snowboard

The anti-labor reform, and training business. A recipe




ARECES .- JOSE MANUEL Liberal Newspaper Editor, The Reformer

As our political tradition in Spain dedicated to practicing the art, which so defined acidity Groucho Marx, of looking for trouble, finding , making a false diagnosis and then applying the wrong remedies. If you want to fix something never find a politician please!.
The undocumented Celestino Corbacho, the then Minister of unemployment has come to the fore these days, in defense of his anti-labor reform, proposing to reduce to 30 days from the current 100, the period in which unemployed can reject offers of training or employment without losing their benefit.

unions, as is his work, have become a rage and have found a new argument to justify their unjustifiable general strike announced months in advance for 29 September.

As usual, our caste leaders full of mediocre high degree, go flying blind, throwing smoke screens and diverting attention from the core problems, which is the best tactic to do what they do best is I mean, no. Call
Labor Reform of this law is a joke, because if someone is conservative, and are contrary to our political reformism all. They are happy with the pro-establishment they have created, not interested in change, because they are frightened, and foster all that does not lead to nowhere, after all that work with fireworks outside and have the favor of the gods gives much room for error.

avoid making a comprehensive analysis of the anti-reform, we will focus precisely on the issue that has sparked such controversy this week, but we understand that sterile polemics, since it does not go where they should. We talked about the training of the unemployed.

The training program as a policy, originally, to encourage the unemployed to jump from one sector to another and so productive improve their chances of job search, that's the theory. We invest a potosí decades in training the unemployed, much has been invested, that the smell of this business have turned the main beneficiaries of social and labor policies, such as unions and employers. This is the budget that moves in this area is, today, is over 50% of funding for these entities. So we have some trade unions, whose occupation, in theory, is to defend the rights of employees, and an employer, whose role would be to defend the interests of industry, turned into academies. And as is evident where it is moving so many millions of euros, there business, jobs, favors and made safe. Because in the end, do not talk about training, talk about cashing in, which is the ultimate goal of all measures taken in the action of government. In reality, this measure favors olo Corbacho as costumbreel fraud, both borrowers servivio, and the beneficiaries.

From our liberal philosophy, we propose a recipe that is much more efficient, and responds to common sense. With these contributions to training employees and conducting business, and grants for this purpose, we believe that the most appropriate would deliver a check directly to the Lord standing on duty, to decide freely you want to receive training and attend the best training to provide the market. Thus we favor the principle of individual freedom, break with the paternalistic state, stimulate employment and training sector development, we make the funds go directly to the providers of services, without intermediaries and support competition. With this simple reform would break with the privileges of caste at the time of capture public funds, reduce the size of government and fight corruption and fraud. What this man does not stand form?. As you remove the check. Everything clean and uncomplicated. Meanwhile

, which favor with the current system is unfair to the training sector, unfair competition benefiting the unions, employers, dark, non-profit organizations, politicians and friends several bars. Interestingly, such is the turnover of the training market, and are so juicy subsidies, which the beneficiary institutions outsourced to teachers and schools to provide these services, so we are in the process with a commission that will benefit from advantages to obtain the grant of the day. So if we apply the liberal prescription, we would either save a significant amount of money, or provide for additional funds to intended purpose, to choose. Would you

seems simple to implement?, as indeed it is, yet again, this itself would be a genuine reform. What is the obstacle?: The tremendous network of interests and powers which would face this simple reform, because these funds benefit many, and few organizations manage privileged social spokesmen falsely calls. Corruption at its best.